





For me, it's about powerful daywear. My dress is very feminine when I'm getting ready to go out at night, I try to have fun with all that being a girl entails. But during the day, when I'm out and about, trying to take care of my business, I like for my clothes to project a rather austere image. What I wear during the day is a long scream from the flowing hair and tulip dresses that come out at night. I usually opt for dress shirts, blazers, wide-legged pants, my hair pulled back in a bun. I don't bother with contacts, I wear my glasses. And of course, keeping proportions in mind, a little slack never hurt anyone. To keep from looking as if I'm heading to work at the office I make sure I'm not too matchy-matchy and add a colour accent in the form of a scarf, belt or bag. I'm not too big on jelwery or watches.



But enough about me. Borrowing from the boys is nothing new, of course, but I find what's going on as of late in terms of androgynous fashion inspiring. It's not about the manly power-suits of the 80's. It's about boyishly cute ensembles that are softened down with a feminine accent.
It's not just about handsome girls, it's about pretty boys too. Versace, Missoni, Burberry, Dior Homme-clad boys that love colour, accessories and tight fits.


As with prominent people that sport or/and promote the look - Boy George, David Bowie, Prince, Freddy Mercury, Diane Keaton as Annie Hall, Diane Keaton as Diane Keaton, Marlene Dietrich, Greta Garbo, Kate Moss, Tilda Swinton, Linda Evangelista, Agyness Deyn, Helmut Lang, Armani, Pierre Cardin are just a couple of names that come to mind.
Diane Keaton in her role as Annie Hall and Kate Moss channeling the look.
Androgynous Fashion is a very interesting social phenomenon in itself. It comes from Andro - male and gyn - female. It's about blurring the line between men- and womenswear. And considering what's going on in the world, it's only appropriate that fashion would follow. Globalization has led to borders dissapearing, cultures blending and markets merging. Women are making as much money as men, building careers and not having babies. Men stay at home. Androgynous fashion reflects just this. It's about individual freedom and self-realization. It combines masculine and feminine attributes to create clothing that reflects the individual wearing it, not the gender.


And there I go again with another post about men's shoes. The entire men's devision of this blog is dedicated to my brother and he likes it when I write about shoes, or anything male-style related for that matter, so please indulge me :).
S***R or Swear, is a London sneaker brand that has been gaining momentum as of late. It's pointy sneakers have a real following among young indie kids. And understandibly so, the Swear sneaker integrates bold materials and fashion-forward design, all adding up to one really cool shoe. On top of everything their quality is renowned, you would not find any lookalikes at the racks of a mass-retailer and they look a lot more expensive than they actually are. What more could you ask for in a shoe?
Here are my personal picks from the Swear selection available on zappos.com (ranging from $169 - $249):


And my favorite one of the bunch, at a $105, the optic dot print tennis shoe with a black trim and rubber sole:






Green everything has been the craze these days, from food to furniture and now clothing, everyone is looking for the eco-friendly label. Considering the levels consumerism our society has reached, where piling up more and more stuff every day is the norm, making that stuff sustainable, reusable and producing it in a way that won't harm the environment is the sensible thing to do. Of course, for an initiative like this to truly have an impact, it would need to be on a mass level. As of late, it seems, there are bold steps being taken in that direction.
Late last year it was announced that denim enthusiast Rogan Gregory would be designing a collection for Target under its GO International banner. Gregory made the frontline as an advocate of eco-ethical fashion when he began co-designing the line Edun with Bono and his wife Ali Hewson in 2005. His Target line, already a fact, consists mainly of beachwear. And although rather limited, because of the fact it's carried by Target, this collection is a rather big step in extending the green message to the masses.
Here is a preview of two of Rogan Gregory's looks that will soon be available in your local Target:
And here are two looks of what's currently available in Target under the GO International label, both for under $40.

Banana Republic is also jumping on the organic wagon with their green collection, a 50-piece line incorporating cotton, bamboo, linen and soy-silk blends.
And just when you're about to say that organic fashion could only work with t-shirts and generally casual wear, there is Linda Loudermil. The designer is one of the pioneers in the eco-movement, having experimented with organic cotton, bamboo, seaweed and even recycled plastic bottles in the development of her environmental fashions. Here are two looks from her FW08/09 Collection:
So what does eco-fashion actually entail? Simply put, it's about using environmentally sensitive fabrics that are organic, reused and reusable. Also its about responsible production techniques that take into consideration the environment, working conditions of the people involved in the manufacturing process and ultimately - the health and well-being of the consumer.
And while all of this is great, the main push in the production of eco-friendly fashion comes from the fact that anything organic is much in vogue at the moment. The fashion industry as we know is propelled by demand and takes only one thing into consideration - profit. Only a very massive switch in consumer preferences could lead to organic fashion becoming the norm. And I don't see this happenning anytime soon. Because when choosing their clothes, most people are driven by utility, by the search for better water, heat and stain resistant textiles, not current trends. Organic and versatile could hardly go in the same sentence. Besides, textile innovation is one of the last frontiers left for fashion to continually reinvent itself. And looking at last season's runway, what were those flowy Lanvin creations that made such a splash made of? Nothing other than good old Polyester. I think my point's been made.

Karen Walker







Colette Dinnigan

Lanvin

Christian Dior

Now Daphne herself is definately a character. She's lived a pretty charmed and privileged life for the most part, but from interviews and newsarticles, I get the sense there's something more to her than your typical hairess. Here is a quote from a recent interview for the British magazine "Style" where she describes her life while married to Greek shipping heir Spyros Niarchos:
"Exactitudes" is defined by its creators, Rotterdam-based photographer Ari Versluis and stylist Ellie Uyttenbroek, as "a contraction of exact and attitude." The project, which has been going on for more than 10 years, has taken its founders around the world in the pursuit of people who are "expressing their individuality.. by dressing alike". Their work has allowed them to form an incredibly large portfolio of what they call "fashion tribes" which serve to show us that no matter who you are or where you are in the world, you probably follow some sort of pre-conceived guidelines when it comes to fashion which makes YOU easy to categorize. Another conclusion one might take away from this experiment is that the most apparent thing about you from the way you dress is not your nationality but your social group.

It is funny, because style is something that is supposed to differentiate us, mark us as particular and distinctive. "Exactitudes" however, exposes a different truth - that when it comes to style, there are distinct groups, but not distinct individuals. That "style" can not exist on its own, and would not survive to be called such, if only promoted by a single individual. You need for a "way of dress" let's call it, to be grinded down to a form that would be approved by the masses, and when its traits are distinguished and familiar - then you can call it a certain style, then you can recognize it as such. I hope I haven't lost you as an audience, I'm simply not sure how to put it better. Either way, it's a very curious contradiction between individuality and uniformity.

I know what you're thinking and yes! there are, of course, people who are extremely unique in their dress. And with those people you can't even call their way with fashion a "style", because you can't box it up or compare it to anything else. You could say they're "eccentric", I guess that could be the vague term to describe any style that doesn't fit within any already designated fashion category. And one of those people is Anna Piaggi, the celebrated Creative Consultant to Vogue Italia.


Ms. Piaggi is a very big discussion in herself, but what I'm using her image to portray here is the fact that being truly stylish, meaning, having a truly unique perspective on fashion and expressing it, takes a lot more passion, conviction and courage than most people could summon.

I find this story elemental to fashion. Too often it appears to me it's the industry's prerogative to endorse and encourage self-indulgence and grandiour engaging us with words as "luxurious" and hedonistic images of all sorts. The cheapest form of ego and mood boosters. We're left to conclude that being fashionable means being around 25, utterly bored, beautiful, privileged, and surrounded by an excusive party of people answering to that same criteria. Decadence and overt sexuality in fashion ads have propelled fascination with people like Paris Hilton, turning them into a constant presence on nearly any type of media. And now we ALL have to pay the price for that - being bombarded by her image 24/7. I'd much rather be addressed by a message that leaves something more to the imagination.



(Sisley has come out claiming those two images are fake. I take them for what they are - a parody of fashion advertisement that hits mark precisely.)Now don't get me wrong, I think everyone is entitled to their vanity. Vanity for the most part is a good thing because it keeps us aware of how we appear to the world. Excessive vanity, however, seems to lead to some people forgetting just that.

Why did she wear a dolce & gabanna dress on her last day of community service? Because she's a goddess to whom the rules do not apply, and us mere mortals need to be reminded of it. And there you have it!





Then I think of the rich table setting:
And of course, of the tea itself..

And it is curiously enough not until this point that I start considering what I would wear in the perfect situation just envisioned. Lucky for us there were so many fun flowery creations on the runway this spring season, there is plenty to choose from. I know many of you are thinking Balenciaga, but as adorable as it would look, those structured dresses are rather stiff and I would imagine - uncomfortable. So here are a couple more suitable choices (Ralph Lauren, Stella McCartney and Carolina Herrera):
And of course, after your friends have departed, you can make yourself another teapot to enjoy on your own, substitute their company with a good book and lean back in your chair to take it all in :).
picture credits: Corbis, Style.com
The perfect accessory seals an outfit, bringing all of its elements together. It helps incorporate the image you are trying to project through your choice of apparel. It is the catchy little thing that brings proportion and character to your look, not the disturbing centerpiece that takes everything off balance.










Whatever external incentives there were, Carla Bruni's choice of apparel was diplomatic in more than one way. She wore a foundamentally french brand led by a very british designer as well as opted for flat shoes in consideration of her husband's 5'5" stature. Carla's sensible choice of footwear, of course, bore the brand's logo.


Considering the fact that politics are usually reserved for rather unattractive people, Carla Bruni sure is a refreshing change. And if nothing else, change is one thing politics and fashion have in common.
On a different note, it seems Mr. Sarcozy definately has a type when it comes to women and he's sticking to it. Personally I find the resemblance between his ex and his new wife almost disturbing.

First picture - Cecilia the ex; Second picture - Carla
Oh and by the way, Carla's 41..
I know for some of you it might be nothing special, but I'm into chic wearable stuff. I appreciate Susie Bubble's sense of adventure when it comes to styling, but I suppose I'm a bit more conventional. I'd love it if people sent me pictures of themselves whenever they get inspired by what they themselves are wearing, but I guess I'll start soliciting more assertively when I've built up this "styling" section of my blog more. About going out and snapping pictures of stylish strangers.. well Vienna is not short on talent, but maybe I am on courage. So at least for a lack of better camera I'll stick to pictures of myself and my friends. For now.













Malcolm X




picture credit: Corbis